To me it seems a bit ... over-sold.
As far as I recall, enzymes are chemicals, not organisms, so describing them as "living" seems problematic.
LT pasteurization occurs at 140°, so "just shy of the legal definition" seems problematic.
I've never actually encountered a cheese described as "raw," though I have encountered cheeses labelled as made from raw milk.
If someone is actually heating the
cheese to 160°, I'd be very surprised -- unless we're talking about mozzarella, in which case, I don't believe you can make it without that step. If we are talking about the
milk being heated to 160°, I certainly would object to it being called "raw [milk] cheese"; do we have any evidence that that is, in fact, happening?
Baby Swiss is a distinctly different cheese than Swiss -- and neither label is actually very helpful at all. Are we talking Gruyere-style, or Emmentaler-style, or ?? Jarlsberg, or ??
Actually, it is clear that they are not making any true Swiss styles such as Emmentaler, etc., since all of them require heating to more than 103°. Likewise, no parma-styles, montasios, etc. Perhaps they limit themselves to mesophilic makes?
I don't recall ANY of the cheeses I have made puffing up in the vacuum bag. At the very least, I would be very hesitant to say that doing so is automatically a good sign. (Late blowing, perchance?)
Is unrefined sea salt really pure, or does it contain various impurities? I don't really know, but by this point, I'm finding it hard to believe anything ...
Shall I go on, or have I picked enough nits? (Methinks you caught me in a snarky mood ...
)